By David F Marks.
A previous post examined the Wessely School hypothesis that ME/CFS is caused by unhelpful beliefs. This idea was exploded as a myth. Here I examine a second Wessely School hypothesis (H2) that states:
Deconditioning causes, or exacerbates the symptoms of, ME/CFS and MUS
Deconditioning refers to multiple, potentially reversible changes in body systems brought about by physical inactivity and disuse. The theory proposes that patient’s claims of an inability to exercise or exert themselves is due to a reluctance to or fear of exercise. Psychological interventions in the form of CBT are indicated to help the patient overcome their dysfunctional beliefs and physical exercise such as GET is offered to help the patient to recondition their body. Without properly controlled trials and investigations it is impossible to determine which is cause and effect, the illness or the deconditioning.
If deconditioning causes or contributes to ME/CFS, then signs of deconditioning should be more pronounced in the sicker patients and less pronounced in the less sick ones. In this section, I review the evidence for and against the deconditioning hypothesis of ME/CFS and MUS. Relevant studies have been conducted over a period of 20+ years. An early uncontrolled study suggested an association between CFS and deconditioning (De Lorenzo et al. (1998). To take a study seriously it must meet the minimum criteria for a controlled study: groups matched at baseline, blinded testing, with objective measures.
To read the rest of this story, click on the link below: